Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Holocene
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Distinguishing sediments from the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers, China: a mineral magnetic approach

Weiguo Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China, wgzhang{at}sklec.ecnu.edu.cn

Yu Xing

State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Lizhon Yu

State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Hua Feng

Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, NJ 07043, USA

Min Lu

Department of Geography, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

The Yellow River and the Yangtze River contribute ~10% of the global fluvial sediment flux to the oceans. Proper characterization of the sediments of the two rivers is critical to the knowledge of their fate in the marginal seas of the west Pacific Ocean. Magnetic measurements have been made on bulk sediments as well as on separated particle size fractions of representative samples from the Yellow and Yangtze River estuaries, with the purpose of providing an efficient means of differentiating both groups of river sediments from each other. We found that on average the Yangtze River estuary sediments have relatively higher ferrimagnetic mineral contents and ferrimagnetic to antiferromagentic ratios compared with the Yellow River estuary sediments. A diagram of Saturated Isothermal Remanent Magnetization (SIRM) versus the demagnetization parameter S–100 can clearly distinguish sediments from the two rivers. Detailed magnetic measurements carried out on particle size fractions provide additional confirmation of magnetic contrasts between the two sets of river sediment samples. These contrasts reflect differences in lithology and weathering regimes in the catchments. To minimize possible biogenic and postdepositional diagenetic overprint in the marine environment, it is recommended that magnetic comparison on the coarser materials (eg, >4 µm) be carried out in addition to bulk measurements. This study shows that the magnetic approach can therefore provide a potentially efficient means of discriminating sediment sources in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. In view of the rapid variations in sediment load carried by these two rivers in recent years, the present data set also provides a baseline against which possible future variations in sediment composition resulting from catchment changes can be assessed.

Key Words: Environmental magnetism • mineral magnetics • magnetic discrimination • sediment source • particle size • Yellow River • Yangtze River • China.

The Holocene, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1139-1145 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0959683608095582


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?