This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McLauchlan, K. K. Articles by Sugita, S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Detecting open vegetation in a forested landscape: pollen and remote sensing data from New England, USA

Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, 6182 Steele Hall, Hanover NH 03755, USA, mclauch{at}ksu.edu

Andrew J. Elmore

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Appalachian Laboratory, 301 Braddock Road, Frostburg MD 21532, USA

W. Wyatt Oswald

Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham MA 01366, USA

Shinya Sugita

Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul MN 55108, USA

The proportional cover of forest and grassland vegetation, known as landscape openness, has been particularly difficult to reconstruct because of differences in pollen productivity and transport between the two vegetation types. To begin to calibrate landscape openness in eastern North America, we collected 21 samples of surface sediments from small ponds (less than 60 ha) in the Upper Connecticut River Valley of New England, USA. Pollen assemblages from these surface samples were compared with vegetation composition around each pond assessed with three different remote sensing methods: land cover digitized from aerial photographs, the National Land Cover Database and a spectral mixture analysis of vegetation structure using LANDSAT data. A principal component analysis indicates that most of the variation in land cover among sites is captured by pollen data and each of the three vegetation methods. Because spectral mixture analysis contains at least as much vegetation information as the other two techniques, while avoiding the problem of classifying vegetation into categories, it is better for comparison with pollen data and detection of landscape openness. Even though there is a relationship between non-arboreal pollen percentages and a metric of landscape openness, it is inadvisable to use pollen percentages alone to infer landscape openness across regions either in modern or ancient times. Quantitative assessments and reconstructions of plant abundance at a higher taxonomic resolution will require detailed vegetation surveys to correlate with pollen data from surface samples and possibly simulations of modern and ancient landscapes. Open areas in a landscape that is over 75% forested can be detected, allowing for future quantitative reconstructions of landscape openness.

Key Words: Landscape openness • forested area • land cover • New England • pollen • remote sensing • vegetation structure • spectral mixture analysis.

The Holocene, Vol. 17, No. 8, 1233-1243 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0959683607085130


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?