Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Environmental Sciences: A Students Companion

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Holocene
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snowball, I.
Right arrow Articles by Muscheler, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Palaeomagnetic intensity data: an Achilles heel of solar activity reconstructions

Ian Snowball

GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Department of Geology, Quaternary Sciences, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden,ian.snowball{at}geol.lu.se

Raimund Muscheler

GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Department of Geology, Quaternary Sciences, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden

Reconstructions of solar activity prior to AD 1600 rely on estimates of the past production rates of cosmogenic radionuclides in the Earth's atmosphere. These rates are modulated by the strength of the solar magnetic field and the intensity of the Earth's geomagnetic dipole. One of the largest uncertainties associated with these reconstructions originates from palaeointensity data and to show how errors in palaeomagnetic data influence reconstructions of solar activity we present different radiocarbon based reconstructions of the solar magnetic modulation parameter ({Phi}) during the Holocene. We considered geomagnetic field changes according to (i) a global archaeomagnetic compilation, (ii) a geomagnetic field model covering the last 7000 years and (iii) a regional sediment relative palaeointensity record. Comparison between alternative solar modulation reconstructions shows that the uncertainties in palaeomagnetic data prevent us from making robust conclusions about solar variability at timescales longer than a few hundred years. Our analyses indicate that the geomagnetic dipole field dominates radiocarbon production at timescales longer than 500 years although a combination of solar and geomagnetic modulation could apply to all timescales. Long-term trends depend on which palaeomagnetic data set is used for correction and there are additional unexplained differences between 10Be and 14C records that question results about long-term changes in solar activity. The higher-resolution geomagnetic field records, which are usually very much smoothed in stacked records, also indicate that part of the shorter-term changes (~500 yr) in the radiocarbon production rate could be attributed to the geomagnetic dipole field. To test this hypothesis and improve our knowledge of past solar activity a higher resolution palaeomagnetic reconstruction of geomagnetic dipole moment is required.

Key Words: Palaeomagnetism • cosmogenic radionuclides • solar activity • Holocene.

The Holocene, Vol. 17, No. 6, 851-859 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0959683607080531


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?