The Holocene

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tlan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hul, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Holocene, Vol. 15, No. 4, 510-517 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0959683605hl828rp
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Comparison of varve and 14C chronologies from Steel Lake, Minnesota, USA

Jian Tlan

Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801, USA

Thomas A. Brown

CAMS, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore CA, 94551, USA; jiantian{at}uiuc.edu,fshu@life.uiuc.edu

Feng Sheng Hul

Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801, USA; Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801, USA; Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801, USA; jiantian{at}uiuc.edu,fshu@life.uiuc.edu

Annually laminated sediments (varves) offer an effective means of acquiring high-quality palaeoenvironmental records. However, the strength of a varve chronology can be compromised by a number of factors, such as missing varves, ambiguous laminations and human counting error. We assess the quality of a varve chronology for the last three millennia from Steel Lake, Minnesota, through comparisons with nine AMS 14C dates on terrestrial plant macrofossils from the same core. These comparisons revealed an overall 8.4% discrepancy, primarily because of missing/uncountable varves within two stratigraphic intervals characterized by low carbonate concentrations and obscure laminations. Application of appropriate correction factors to these two intervals results in excellent agreement between the varve and 14C chronologies. These results, together with other varve studies, demonstrate that an independent age-determination method, such as 14C dating, is usually necessary to verify, and potentially correct, varve chronologies.

Key Words: Varve chronology • 14C chronology • laminated sediment • counting error • varve-count adjustment • palaeoclimate • late Holocene • Steel Lake • Minnesota


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?