This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Buck, C. E. Articles by Lowe, D. J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bayesian tools for tephrochronology

Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK; c.e.buck{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Thomas F.G. Higham

Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, UK

David J. Lowe

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hillcrest Road, Hamilton, New Zealand

It is suggested that Bayesian statistical methods for radiocarbon data interpretation, already widely used in archaeology, also have potential to improve the dating of tephra layers and hence enhance their use for tephrochronology. By re-analysing data from a recently published paper in which the authors sought to identify the calendar date of the eruption of fourteenth-century AD Kaharoa Tephra, a key marker in New Zealand prehistory, it is shown that Bayesian methods can be used to draw together a coherent collection of radiocarbon data, undertake formal outlier detection, and include prior information. Regardless of the calibration curve adopted, the distribution of likely dates for the Kaharoa eruption is multimodal. By including prior information from wiggle-matched dendrochronology, the uncertainty on the estimate of the calendar date is reduced from a range of about 100 years to about 25 years (i.e., 648-623 cal. BP, with modes at 638 and 632 cal. BP). Using sensitivity analysis, however, it is shown that such estimates are affected by the quality and nature of the prior information available. As a result, we urge tephrochronologists to seek fastidiously both high-quality radiocarbon data and reliable stratigraphic sequences that might inform future geochronological model building.

Key Words: Radiocarbon dating • tephrochronology • Bayesian statistics • geochronology • Kaharoa Tephra • archaeology • Holocene • New Zealand

The Holocene, Vol. 13, No. 5, 639-647 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0959683603hl652ft


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Petrie and R. Torrence Assessing the effects of volcanic disasters on human settlement in the Willaumez Peninsula, Papua New Guinea: a Bayesian approach to radiocarbon calibration The Holocene, August 1, 2008; 18(5): 729 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Lowe Globalization of tephrochronology: new views from Australasia Progress in Physical Geography, June 1, 2008; 32(3): 311 - 335. [PDF]

				M. Walker and J. Lowe Quaternary science 2007: a 50-year retrospective Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 2007; 164(6): 1073 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]