Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Environmental Sciences: A Students Companion

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Holocene
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Palynological and AVHRR observations of modern vegetational gradients in eastern North America

John W. Williams

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California – Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA williams{at}nceas.ucsb.edu

Stephen T. Jackson

Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA

Both fossil pollen records and satellite-based instruments are remote sensors of Earth's vegetation with complementary properties. Satellites supply spatially continuous and highly resolved images for the past several decades, whereas pollen records include local and regional signals of vegetation composition, spanning millennia. Together, pollen and satellite-based observations measure vegetation change across a broad range of temporal scales. Here, we compare pollen percentages of needleleaved and broadleaved plant taxa to AVHRR estimates of percent tree cover, for two regions in eastern North America with well-defined physiognomic gradients. The linear fit between the pollen percentages and percent tree cover is strongest for search window half-widths of 25–75 km and unweighted or inverse-distance weightings, consistent with previous taxon-based studies of regional pollen source area and transport. Variance not explained by the linear model arises primarily from differential properties of the AVHRR and pollen sensors, particularly site-specific variability in the pollen data and intertaxonomic differences in pollen representation. These sources of variance can be minimized by regionally smoothing the pollen data and multivariate analogue approaches. A strong fit between observed tree-cover percentages and best-analogue estimates (r2 = 0.70 to 0.78) suggests that analogue-based methods can be applied to infer past tree-cover proportions from fossil pollen records. Linking pollen and AVHRR observations in this manner effectively extrapolates satellite-derived variables beyond the few decades of direct observation, enabling study of longer-term variations in land cover and impacts upon climate and the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Key Words: AVHRR • land cover • plant life forms • pollen analysis • modern analogue technique • remote sensing • vegetation

The Holocene, Vol. 13, No. 4, 485-497 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0959683603hl613rp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The HoloceneHome page
K. K. McLauchlan, A. J. Elmore, W. Wyatt Oswald, and S. Sugita
Detecting open vegetation in a forested landscape: pollen and remote sensing data from New England, USA
The Holocene, December 1, 2007; 17(8): 1233 - 1243.
[Abstract] [PDF]