This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Korhola, A. Articles by Blom, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Chironomids, temperature and numerical models: a reply to Seppälä

Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Hydrobiology, University of Helsinki, PO Box 17 (Arkadiankatu 7), FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

H. J. B. Birks

Botanical Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway, and Environmental Change Research Centre, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK

H. Olander

Geological Survey of Finland, PO Box 96, FIN-02151 Espoo, Finland

T. Blom

Department of Geography, PO Box 64, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

We reply to comments by Seppälä (2001) concerning the suitability of the surface-water temperature measurements and mean July air temperature estimates used by Olanderet al. (1999) to derive quantitative chironomid-temperature transfer functions. We use new data for water temperatures based on two-hourly recordings from thermistors installed in 32 lakes and air-temperature data from an automatic weather station at one lake to refute Seppälä’s accusations that our field data are unsatisfactory. We also respond to Seppälä’s suggestions about factors influencing chironomid distribution and abundance and suggest that there is a serious confusion of temporal and spatial scales between Seppälä’s ideas and the Olanderet al. study. We attempt to explain the underlying logic behind empirical transfer functions that form a major part of Holocene quantitative environmental reconstructions and the major assumptions behind such transfer functions as Seppälä appears not to understand the basis or the assumptions of such widely used numerical models in palaeolimnology. We respond to Seppälä’s comments that lakewater pH and distance beyond tree-line have been inadequately measured and answer his erroneous understanding that a helicopter was used to facilitate lake sampling. We briefly consider Seppälä’s suggestion that a helicopter can totally mix the surface water of a lake for many hours.

Key Words: Chironomidae • calibration modelling • transfer functions • summer temperature • palaeotemperatures • field measurements • northern Fennoscandia

The Holocene, Vol. 11, No. 5, 615-622 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/095968360101100513


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. R. Belyea Revealing the Emperor's new clothes: niche-based palaeoenvironmental reconstruction in the light of recent ecological theory The Holocene, July 1, 2007; 17(5): 683 - 688. [Abstract] [PDF]