Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Holocene
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possnert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Variation in 14C age of macrofossils and different fractions of minute peat samples dated by AMS

Mats Nilsson

Department of Forest Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden; Mats.B.Nilsson{at}sek.slu.se

Malin Klarqvist

Department of Forest Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden; Department of Forest Vegetation Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden

Elisabet Bohlin

Department of Forest Vegetation Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden

Göran Possnert

The Tandem Laboratory, Uppsala University, Box 533, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

Accurate 14C dating of peat samples is crucial if peat stratigraphies are to be used as historical archives. To analyse the variation in 14C age within small peat samples, the 14C age of different mire plant remains and peat fractions (n = 39) from 2 cm thick peat slices was determined using accelerator mass spectrometry. The 14C ages of mosses were assumed to be the most accurate. To verify this we also tested the possibility that uncertainties could be introduced by mosses at the mire surface reassimilating CO2 produced during the decomposition of old peat. The average 14C content of living mosses (110.5–110.9 absolute modern% (pM)) did not differ between threeSphagnum species, representing hummock-, carpet-and lawn-growing species. Their 14C contents were also identical, within experimental limits, to the current 14C content of the atmosphere. Depending on sampled depth and peat type, the differences in calibrated 14C age between different fragments or fractions, within specific 2 cm thick peat samples, varied between 365 and ~1000 years, with one exceptional deviation of 2125 years in a sample from a mesotrophic sedge peat. Alkali-treated peat samples always gave greater ages than the corresponding untreated peat samples and small-size fractions (<0.045 mm), indicating that the fraction removed by standard alkali treatment is very similar to the small-size fraction. When compared to alkali-treated moss fragments, most other fractions and fragments deviated considerably. Even alkali-treated bulk samples deviated from the alkali-treated moss fragments. We propose thatSphagnum plant fragments should be used in 14C AMS dating of peat since they yield the most reliable 14C dates.

Key Words: Radiocarbon dating • macrofossils • peat fractions • carbon accumulation • boreal mires • Holocene • Sphagnum peat • sedge peat

The Holocene, Vol. 11, No. 5, 579-586 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/095968301680223521
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The HoloceneHome page
M. Lamentowicz, K. Tobolski, and E. A.D. Mitchell
Palaeoecological evidence for anthropogenic acidification of a kettle-hole peatland in northern Poland
The Holocene, December 1, 2007; 17(8): 1185 - 1196.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. M. Scharer, R. J. Weldon II, T. E. Fumal, and G. P. Biasi
Paleoearthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault, Wrightwood, California, 3000 to 1500 B.C.: A New Method for Evaluating Paleoseismic Evidence and Earthquake Horizons
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1054 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The HoloceneHome page
H. Karlsson, G. Hornberg, G. Hannon, and E.-M. Nordstrom
Long-term vegetation changes in the northern Scandinavian forest limit: a human impact-climate synergy?
The Holocene, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 37 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The HoloceneHome page
W. W. Oswald, P. M. Anderson, T. A. Brown, L. B. Brubaker, F. S. Hu, A. V. Lozhkin, W. Tinner, and P. Kaltenrieder
Effects of sample mass and macrofossil type on radiocarbon dating of arctic and boreal lake sediments
The Holocene, July 1, 2005; 15(5): 758 - 767.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The HoloceneHome page
D. Mauquoy, D. Mauquoy, B. van Geel, M. Blaauw, A. Speranza, and J. van der Plicht
Changes in solar activity and Holocene climatic shifts derived from 14C wiggle-match dated peat deposits
The Holocene, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]