The Holocene

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Holocene, Vol. 10, No. 6, 769-776 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/09596830095024

Agricultural origins: the evidence of modern and ancient DNA

Martin Jones

Department of Archaeology, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK

Terry Brown

Department of Biomolecular Sciences, UMIST, Manchester, UK

The appearance of agriculture is one of the most striking features of Holocene human history, a feature that has long been studied in an interdisciplinary fashion, bringing archaeology together with plant and animal genetics. This paper reviews new developments in that study, consequent upon recent advances in DNA science. Among these advances is the possibility of complementing modern DNA data with fragmentary evidence of ancient DNA. Following a short account of the historical foundations of this research, studies of plant and animal domesticates based upon variations in protein, modern DNA and ancient DNA are reviewed in turn. The results of these studies are considered against a background of two contrasting models of how agriculture originated and spread, characterized by Blumler (1992) as ‘stimulus-diffusion’ and ‘independent invention’. We argue that existing evidence from DNA supports neither model in its extreme form, favouring instead an intermediate model.

Key Words: Archaeology • agriculture • domestication • ancient DNA • protein analysis • genetics • wheat • rice • maize • sorghum • cattle • horse


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The HoloceneHome page
G. Hillman, G. Hillman, R. Hedges, A. Moore, S. Colledge, and P. Pettitt
New evidence of Lateglacial cereal cultivation at Abu Hureyra on the Euphrates
The Holocene, May 1, 2001; 11(4): 383 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]